Judge Mathis Podcast

First, The plaintiff brings her biological mother to court, but she was raised by her grandparents. She says her mother was a crack addict and prostitute who was always in and out of jail. The plaintiff claims her mom busted her car windows during an argument, so she’s suing. The defendant gave birth to the plaintiff when she was 16 and wasn’t ready to be a mother at the time. She admits to breaking her daughter’s window, but she did it in self-defense.

Then, The plaintiff and defendant became friends after meeting at work. The plaintiff says she took her car to the defendant for repairs, but he never gave it back to her, so she’s suing for the value of a car. The defendant argues he completed the repairs and left it at his mom’s house, but the plaintiff never picked it up.

Plus, The plaintiff and defendant were best friends, but everything changed when they moved in together. He claims he saw the defendant do drugs all the time. He argues the defendant stopped paying rent, so he’s suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff kicked him out and he did what he could to make up the money.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First. The plaintiff and defendant bonded because they both had sugar daddies. They became roommates, but then he said the defendant accused him of pulling a knife on her. He says the defendant kicked him out of their house, so he’s suing for unreturned property and lost wages. The defendant argues she was forced to file a restraining order against the plaintiff. She denies owing him.

Then, It’s a “Judge Mathis” throwback! The plaintiff and defendant met in prison, and they started dating. The defendant got out of prison several months before her, and the plaintiff moved in with her when she was released. The plaintiff claims the defendant ruined her clothes when she found out the plaintiff started dating someone else, so she’s suing. The defendant is countersuing for car damages because she claims the plaintiff wrecked the car when she borrowed it.

Now, they’re back in court, but this time, the defendant from the last case is the plaintiff. They dated on and off for six years, but the plaintiff says her ex is verbally and physically abusive. She’s suing for stolen property and an electric bill. The defendant is countersuing for the cost of a trip.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, The plaintiff considers the defendant her niece even though her brother denied being her father. She’s petitioning the court for a DNA test to see if she is actually her niece. She’s also suing for a loan and court costs. The defendant says she was a troubled kid and grew up in foster care. She’s countersuing for harassment.

Then, The plaintiff used to be friends with the defendant. He rented an apartment to the defendant, but he claims she threw wild parties. He’s suing for unpaid rent. The defendant argues the apartment had tons of problems with it and violated city codes. She’s countersuing for emotional distress and hotel expenses.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, The plaintiff has been friends with the defendant since high school. She cosigned on a rental car for the defendant, but she says the defendant didn’t return the car on time. She’s suing for rental car costs and traffic tickets. The defendant says her relationship with the plaintiff fell apart because she didn’t show any sympathy when the defendant almost died in a car accident. She doesn’t think she owes the plaintiff anything.

Then, The plaintiff and defendant were friends with benefits, though the plaintiff claims the defendant used her for money. She loaned him money, got him new tires for his car, and helped him pay for a new car, but she hasn’t been paid back, so she’s suing for breach of contract. The defendant argues the plaintiff was obsessed with him. He’s countersuing for harassment.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices