Interesting Times with Ross Douthat

How would you live if you knew when you were going to die? I sat down with the former Republican senator Ben Sasse to hear how he is facing his own mortality after receiving a terminal cancer diagnosis. For Sasse, cancer brings pain, but also clarity, sharpening his focus on the state of our politics, his wife and three children, and the God he expects to shortly meet.

0:00 - Intro

01:51 - Ben Sasse’s terminal diagnosis

07:14 - Oncology navigation and clinical trials

16:10 - Sasse’s career in the Senate and reflections on politics

32:55 - What could a civic-minded Senator achieve?

38:15 - Reforming academia and liberal arts

54:49 - Facing mortality: The “final enemy”

59:27 - Advice for the living

1:01:10 - The “prayer of pancreatic cancer”

(A full transcript of this episode is available on the Times website.)

Thoughts? Email us at [email protected]. Please subscribe to our YouTube Channel, Interesting Times with Ross Douthat.

Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher. For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app.

Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Even if you don’t believe he walked on water, the teachings of Jesus still have a certain power. My guest this week, the New Testament scholar Bart Ehrman, calls himself a “Christian atheist.” I asked Ehrman to come on the show to explore Jesus’ message, discuss how the Bible has shaped the morality of the Western world and explain what even the biggest skeptic can learn from one of mankind’s oldest texts.

0:00 - Intro

02:20 - Jesus’s moral teachings

08:15 - Ehrman’s path away from Christianity and faith

21:22 - The historical evidence for Jesus and the New Testament

33:26 - The challenges in interpreting the Gospels

52:07 - The contradictions in the New Testament

01:04:10 - Historical and geographical validity

01:09:25 - The visions and reality of the Resurrection 

01:19:21 - A “Christian atheist”

(A full transcript of this episode is available on the Times website.)

Thoughts? Email us at [email protected]. Please subscribe to our YouTube Channel, Interesting Times with Ross Douthat.

Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher. For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app.

Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Is the U.S. winning the war with Iran? Even though President Trump claims success, it doesn’t quite feel like it — oil and gas prices are high, the Strait of Hormuz is effectively closed, and the Iranian regime is still in place. Mark Dubowitz, the chief executive of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and a prominent Iran hawk, explains why “total victory” is within reach in spite of the cost. I pressed him on the gap between Trump’s desire for a quick deal and his desire to end the Islamic Republic.

00:00 - Intro

00:03:49 -  Is Iran biding its time until Trump leaves office?

00:07:07 -  Three phases to regime change

00:09:42 -  Iran's military capabilities and the Strait of Hormuz

00:14:54 -  How will the next American president treat Iran?

00:18:48 -  The battle for the Strait of Hormuz

00:23:27 -  Will Iran attack its neighbors?

00:28:43 -  Will Trump cut a deal?

00:38:19 -  Does Israel think Trump is its best chance?

00:43:04 -  Risk of U.S. alienation from Israel

00:48:01 -  The cost of inaction and the Iranian people

Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher. For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app.

Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The idea that white people — and white men in particular — face discrimination has become something of an obsession on the American right.

It’s a view that my guest this week shares. Jeremy Carl was nominated to a State Department post by the Trump administration, which sparked a lot of controversy. Carl is the author of “The Unprotected Class,” in which he makes the case that white Americans are in danger of becoming “second-class citizens.” 

I wanted to know what he thinks constitutes anti-white discrimination and whether focusing on it inevitably leads to white nationalism. After we taped this interview, Carl withdrew his nomination, acknowledging that he lacked enough support to be confirmed.

0:00 - Intro

01:59 - Jeremy Carl’s trajectory and State Department Nomination

05:24 - The Civil Rights Act and rise of anti-white Discrimination

12:20 - The impact of immigration on white Americans

24:53 - The "radicalization" of D.E.I.

37:37 - Carl’s provocative language and controversial tweets

51:06 - “White culture” vs. “civic nationalism”

01:01:00 - The fours pillars of “Americanness”

(A full transcript of this episode is available on the Times website.)

Thoughts? Email us at [email protected]. Please subscribe to our YouTube Channel, Interesting Times with Ross Douthat.

Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher. For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app.

Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Can the Democrats finally seize on President Trump’s increasing unpopularity and end their slump? It seems to me as though 2026 is providing them ample opportunity. But I wanted to know what they actually stand for. Have they learned anything about immigration? Are they ready for the new politics of artificial intelligence? To find out, I asked someone I consider a true man of the left, Chris Hayes, the host of “All In With Chris Hayes” on MS NOW.

00:00 Intro

02:09 - Democrats: The state of play in 2026

06:46 - How Israel fractures the Democrats

09:19 - Immigration reform beyond the “old consensus”

19:46 - Models for Democratic leadership: Mark Kelly, Ruben Gallego, Rafael Warnock, and Jon Ossoff

27:22 - 2028: Kamala Harris, Gavin Newsom and “the Hillary Clinton problem” 

30:41 - The politics of attention

36:19 - The challenges of achieving a Leftist society

45:37 - A Leftist case against A.I.

1:04:23 - Will A.I. define the 2028 election?

(A full transcript of this episode is available on the Times website.)

Thoughts? Email us at [email protected]. Please subscribe to our YouTube Channel, Interesting Times With Ross Douthat.

Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher. For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app.

Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.